Holiday Musings… 1971 Pierce-Arrow

Home Page Forums General Holiday Musings… 1971 Pierce-Arrow

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #392167

    Back in the early Sixties GM’s VP of Design, Bill Mitchell modified the new for 1963 Buick Riviera to create a show car called the Silver Arrow.

    Buick Riviera Silver Arrow I (1963)

    He did it again in the early Seventies based on the 1971-3 Riviera, now called the Silver Arrow III.

    Buick Riviera Silver Arrow III (1972)

    Particularly with the latter, the name, color and fastback design suggest that Mitchell had Pierce-Arrow’s Silver Arrow show car in mind. Which got me thinking… what might a Pierce-Arrow revived by GM have looked like, and why might GM have undertaken such a project?

    On the question of why, there was arguably precedence in the early Seventies, Stutz having been reborn as a heavily modified Pontiac Grand Prix and personal coupes were all the rage. In Dearborn, the Lincoln Continental Mark series had been reborn in 1969 using the body shell of the Thunderbird, to great success.

    Of course, Cadillac had Eldorado but I wonder if Mitchell thought there was room for something else, a genuine style leader. Not that he was actually thinking of resurrecting Pierce – we may never know – but he certainly envisioned a special car in a rarified space, and Riviera was how he communicated his thoughts. Which directs us to the question of what. Like the T-Bird/Mark sharing scheme, borrowing heavily from the new boat-tail Riviera could have allowed a wonderful Pierce to materialize with minimal investment, with good payback coming from high pricing even at low volumes.

    Here are a few image work-ups suggesting one approach to differentiation with Riv. Up front the only changes needed might have been with the fascia and gill. At the rear, a smaller backlight together with fender skirts would have closed in the body, improving surface flow and lending an air of privacy and richness. For the deck, rear bumper and tail lights the ’73 Riviera had a different design than the ’71-72 and could have easily served as Riviera’s design for all three years, Pierce using the ’71-72 Riviera design exclusively.

    Inside, Pierce could have carried the highest possible level of craftsmanship that GM could produce in volume, retaining Riv’s I/P structure and shape but offering its own instrumentation and materials, exquisitely executed.

    Would the car have taken sales from Cadillac? Probably minimally given its wild design and high price. As to what dealer base it would have used… perhaps Oldsmobile?

    #405569

    Not a fan of vinyl roof on this would-be Pierce-Arrow so here’s a view without it.

    #405570

    Top view showing the body drama. Unlike first two images I didn’t attempt to modify the front to extend the fascia and bumper, just wanted to show the rear surfacing. No, visibility out the rear would not have been good… but that wouldn’t have been the mission of this car.

    #405571

    And finally, a mod showing what I think would have been classier wheels more suitable for Pierce-Arrow. The Riviera could have used the artillery style shown in the other images.

    #405572

    Renwal Models came out with this model kit in the 60’s as a futuristic concept car. It is my understanding these kits are getting rarer to find and can fetch a few dollars.

    #405574

    That car has always been an idea project of mine, trying to find suitable donor car and plausible rationale for big car company to produce it. One idea was for Chrysler to work with its ex Design VP, Virgil Exner, who created the revival Pierce, to meld a Dodge Charger roof, Coronet doors and extra long hood.

    #405606

    I’m enchanted by the 1966 P-A design. Please make sure mine has a 426 Hemi

    in it. A 4 speed would allow me to make it sing or growl to my ear’s

    satisfaction. I wonder if Santa would trade in his sleigh on one?

    #405607

    Like the Riviera mods, fellows. You better stop it, or people will be wanting cars again!

    As for visibility: if you have enough Car you don’t need to look back…

    #405608

    I do think it takes a measure of intestinal fortitude to take liberties

    with the design elements in a boat tail Riviera. Everyone who bought one

    must have fought parting with them when the junker was on the horizon,

    for they are plentiful and affordable on the market today.

    #405609

    I was heavily influenced by the Virgil Exner ’66 Classic revival series, particularly the P-A and they were a big factor of in my interest in mid ’30’s Classics. Most of them were in my view quite ugly when you got to the full model as opposed to the basic side views of the picture on the box. The ’66 Pierce looked great to me from all angles. The ’66 Bugatti was the also very good looking and I finally found one of those models unbuilt a few years ago. I have the remains of a ’66 P-A kit I built in the 60’s and an unbuilt kit I found on Ebay a few years ago.

    I once scaled the measurements of the P-A and found it would have been about 22′ long for what amounts to a 4 seat club sedan!

    I have had idle thoughts at times that a mid ’70’s Datsun 240 or 280Z could be modified into smaller reasonable facsimile that could be a pretty nice car.

    Jim

    #405619

    Like Mitchell, Exner loved classic cars and knew the importance of proportions. One could only imagine what they both would think of the crossovers cluttering today’s roadways, mine being one of them.

    Fastbacks had a resurgence in the Sixties and Exner was tuned in, may have even sparked some of it. Looking at the many industry offerings, AMC’s Marlin seemed to evoke the Silver Arrow from the rear and with its two-tone paint. Here’s an interesting article on its development, says Abernethy forced Design to raise the rear roof 1.5 inches for headroom, which they felt ruined the design.

    https://www.hemmings.com/blog/2014/11/21/amc-designer-vince-geraci-on-the-marlin-theres-a-very-fine-line-between-unique-and-strange/

    Here’s a work-up with the roof lowered 1.5 inches over the rear seats, together with a long hood and 4 doors. Have seen the Marlin at shows, it looks better than in photos. That said, am not sure it would have made a great Pierce revival. The sides are too squared to evoke Exner’s flowing design and the car simply does not have the right stuff.

    #405620

    A car that I think did have the right stuff was the ’68 Olds Holiday Coupe. GM did a good job figuring out how to dial in fastback styling while still delivering decent rear visibility, certainly a better effort than Ex’s revival design. The only changes I made to this ’69 Olds were to increase the body length 4 inches to match the sedan, change from 2 to 4 doors and add 6 additional inches of front axle-to-dash that the ’69 Grand Prix offered.

    It really is incredible the influence the Silver Arrow had on the industry, its echos lasting decades.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.