Forum Replies Created

Viewing 9 posts - 61 through 69 (of 69 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 1936 1602 v12 Not Charging: How to test generator #426242
    Herbert Tull

    John,
    Your 1602 has a 3-brush type generator with a cutout relay AND a voltage regulator. Look at the wiring diagram on page 90 of the Pierce Arrow Wiring and Tune-Up Guide (published by PAS) This is a very good reference. See PAS Service Bulletin 89-#1 for a short explanation of this regulator; “Hollander parts interchange manual lists the original relay-regulator unit used on Pierce- Arrows from mid-year 1935 models on, as an Autolite #40300, used on no other automobile vehicles.”
    This diagram does show a field fuse in the regulator, which could cause some of the trouble you describe. Another problem could be the loss of residual magnetism in the field iron, which happens after sitting for several years – the remedy is to flash the field coil with battery voltage for a very few seconds to restore this residual magnetism.

    My 1943 Motors Manual confirms that 35-38 Pierce did use the Startix and a 3-brush generator. The third brush set the output voltage of the generator and is typically adjustable around the armature to make this happen. The generator section does explain that (1) polarity does matter to the voltage regulator, (2) there are several types of regulators used on cars of this vintage (A) Light switch controlled step voltage, (B) two step relay control and (3) vibrating regulator, which rapidly steps the output up-and-down in response to battery voltage.

    A quick search of the internet DID turn up a mechanical voltage regulator with positive ground that should work to confirm your system: The Ford 8N & 9N from about 1950 have this system and the regulator is still available from antique tractor supply houses. Not a perfect fit, but probably better than nothing to prove if your regulator is the problem.

    The cutout relay is the other issue and that can be investigated by removing the cover and verifying that the coil is a complete circuit and the contact arm is free to move. Some people change this out to a large diode hidden in the original enclosure, but should not really be necessary.

    Hope this is helpful

    in reply to: C’mon, guys and gals, lets use this forum! #426203
    Herbert Tull

    I would add another 2 cents worth to the thread. While I think that Curtis is right on the money with most of his observations, I would add that the cancellation of so many events, from the annual PAS show to local shopping center get-together afternoons due to this pandemic has taken our attention away from the old cars and onto other near-term concerns. Given that many of us are in that target demographic of “older people”, it certainly makes sense to protect ourselves and our friends by not gathering together. Unfortunately, it also takes our attention away from working on our cars when the day-to-day priorities are so much more difficult than they used to be.

    The camaraderie and face-to-face conversations are a key part of the antique car hobby. For many years, I have heard that it is the people involved that make these cars fun and not obsolete old vehicles themselves, which I have certainly found to be true. Being relatively new to PAS, I have certainly seen and enjoyed the fellowship and friendships at the show in Indiana and the 2020 annual meeting in Williamsburg.

    Yes, the new forum had some problems with losing data, which may have scared some people away, but the forum seems to be working much better now. My hope is that as this pandemic finally gets under control, our members will gravitate back to the forum for contact and technical support.

    Stay safe, Herb

    in reply to: Oil pressure gauge line #426123
    Herbert Tull

    James,
    The issue whether to have a rubber section in the oil pressure gauge copper line will depend on the type of motor mounts installed in the car. If you have SOLID motor mounts, then a solid line will be OK as the motor does not move relative to the chassis or firewall. This also means that solid exhaust line mounts will be satisfactory.

    On the other hand, if your car has rubber (flexible) motor mounts to reduce vibration like all modern vehicles, then the motor DOES shake relative to the chassis and the rubber tubing section is essential. Copper will quickly work harden and become brittle from flexing. If the engine is moving relative to the firewall, then you do need something to absorb that movement to prevent the copper tube from cracking and leaking. The same is true with the exhaust mounts, which is why all modern cars have a rubber flex piece between the body and exhaust line at every support point.

    Good luck and stay safe during this plague. Herb

    in reply to: 1929-31 Judging Technical Standards Video #425906
    Herbert Tull

    Jane,

    Thanks for posting this video.  It is a great resource for those of us with cars of this period, but did not attend the meeting – also great advertising for making the effort to attend each event.  It verified that some of the parts on my car that I questioned are correct – and pointed out other places where I have work to do.

    Well Done!      Herb Tull

    in reply to: After 9 years #425022
    Herbert Tull

    Bill, This sounds like your spring pivots may be the (old) UNEF thread standard that were 18 threads per inch in this size range (dimensions are published on-line). Unusual, but not unheard-of for this era of manufacturing. Measure the thread inside diameter carefully (use a T gauge & micrometer) plus a thread gauge to verify the pitch, then consult a thread chart (table) before assuming the size.   During this period, bolts were made on screw machines and lathes that had fixed gears to set the threads-per-inch, so some unusual combinations came about (such as the 14 thread-per-inch series).

    Looking in my 1929 parts catalog, the front mount of the springs is not complex and the threads are likely to hold retainers that give the spring a vertical pivot but prevent horizontal movement.  Check with John Cislak, as he advertised shackle set for the older models and they are likely to be quite similar. Even if you need them custom-made, they are not that complex.

    In any event, measure the threads carefully and consult a thread chart (table) before assuming the size.  Taps to clean up the threads in your spring hangers are available, but rather expensive.  Herb

     

    in reply to: AACA Grand National #424956
    Herbert Tull

    Stories like Anthony’s are why safety glass, seat belts and the other automotive safety features were invented and then made mandatory! One of the best things that AACA did for our hobby many years ago was to make safety glass and fire extinguishers mandatory for all cars exhibited at their shows, which set the standard for everyone else.

    I have installed seat belts in cars from the 1950’s & 60’s that I fixed up as daily drivers, and will probably also add them to my Pierce this winter. However, the wooden floorboards will require a bit of careful engineering and reinforcement to get sufficiently strong attachment points, as the inertia loads of our bodies during a crash can be very large. Many years ago during Engineering school (1974), I had a summer job testing seat belt anchors in new cars and several failed by peeling up the sheet metal of the trunk floor, as the test load of about 600 pounds was applied to each belt.

    Our cars are beautiful artwork, but some things about “the good old days” weren’t really all that good. Preserving and enjoying historical equipment is indeed a very enjoyable hobby, but learning how to make transportation safer and better is more important for society in the long run.  Herb

    in reply to: Brakes 1930 model B #424124
    Herbert Tull

    Oivind,

    The eccentric cam you show is symmetrical, so it can be actually be adjusted from either direction. On my 1929, there is a covered slot in the drum that is used to test the distance from drum to show with a feeler gauge and I strongly recommend you use it. I have recently been down this path with mine and it is not trivial. Keep trying to spin the wheel until it drags on the high spots of the drum as you adjust it. The other thing the feeler gauge can help you understand is whether the shoes have the same radius of curvature as the drum. re-curving each shoe before putting them back on the car was a point of adjustment at one time when re-lining the brakes.

    Here is a web page for adjusting the Bendix 3-shoe brakes; https://dmacweb.com/tech/brakes/bendix/BENDIX.htm

    There is also a manual on the web that I have printed out that goes into great detail on how these brakes work. There is a download, if you scroll down in this AACA forum: https://forums.aaca.org/topic/163474-three-shoe-brakespros-cons/

    Getting everything to balance is not that easy, as there are about 4 variables on each wheel (eccentric, main cam pre-load, rod setting to balance between wheels and how round is your brake drum. Put the car up on jack stands and do the major adjustment on all 4 wheels to keep them in balance, so the car won’t pull to one side.

    Since these drums are STEEL and not cast iron, you don’t want to turn them and normal brake machines cannot handle it anyway. Good luck with it – there is a lot of trial and error as you. Herb

    in reply to: LED Headlight Bulbs #413770
    Herbert Tull

    I realize this is a “stale” thread, but wanted to add my $0.02 as I am changing the lights on my ’29 to LEDs. The best advantage is more light with less current. I ordered 1129 headlight LEDs and 1158 brake/tail light lamps from http://www.LEDlights.com. The parts arrived rapidly,fit well and are substantially brighter. I did notice that the focus of the headlights is different, but should still be acceptable for high-beam use. Adding the resister for dim lights should take care of in-town driving concerns.

    The challenge now is the low (dim) setting for the headlights, which wasn’t working with the incandescent lamps either. Because of the lower current draw, I will need to experiment to see what voltage (and therefore resistance) will work best for the “dim” setting. V=IR is the electrical relationship. I did see another thread here that the resister is supposed to be inside the left frame rail, so that is the target location for the new one, once I size it.

    Important note: LED is an acronym for Light Emitting DIODE. Diodes only conduct in ONE direction, so a negative ground lamp is not likely to work on a positive ground car. I have had this problem on AC applications, where we had too much flicker with LEDs (on a 25 Hz system) as it was only on during half the cycle. The vendor did distinguish his parts between positive and negative ground applications, so I take that as a strong hint in ordering.

    Herb

    in reply to: Fan blade bolts #410630
    Herbert Tull

    The size 12-32 is indeed real. MSC carries both dies and taps in this size if you need to clean up the ones you have or make new ones from stock. Amazon advertises a go/nogo thread gauge for this size.

    No, it is not a common size; #12 is an oddball size anyway, but the UNC/UNF standard thread counts are 24 and 28 per inch. The most common 32 thread count is a #10 screw.

    Best of luck,

    Herb Tull

Viewing 9 posts - 61 through 69 (of 69 total)