Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 161 through 180 (of 568 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2019 Meet Photos? #410192

    Another winner!

    in reply to: 2019 Meet Photos? #410181

    1

    in reply to: 2019 Meet Photos? #410180

    Another

    in reply to: 2019 Meet Photos? #410179

    Another

    in reply to: 2019 Meet Photos? #410178

    I have a few.

    in reply to: Harmonic Damper-Balancer, 1931 Series 43 Eight #410147

    I did learn this weekend, while studying my 1929-1930 parts lists will illustrations, that the test specification, at least for the Model C engine, is 30 to 40 pounds pull at the rim should cause it to slip.

    in reply to: A Sure Hand and a Fine Automobile #410142

    I am reading my copy; agree with Rick, it’s a good book and a great addition to the body of knowledge about the Pierce-Arrow.

    in reply to: Pierce-Arrow Number Plate ID #410134

    I found in the old service bulletins that this was a 137 inch wheelbase Car, assembled during June 1931. The owner of the number plate was surprised that much infonwascavailable.

    in reply to: Pierce-Arrow Number Plate ID #410093

    Thanks, Bob!

    in reply to: 1933 Pierce for sale #410094

    Ford Fusion money for a decent Pierce-Arrow seems OK to me.

    in reply to: Harmonic Damper-Balancer, 1931 Series 43 Eight #410108

    In perusing my new Series 80 manual last evening, I noticed the illustration and description of the harmonic damper, including advice that, upon adjusting the compression springs until a tension of 15 pounds applied tangentially at the rim is required to slip the damper. Just like the unit Rolls-Royce used for years.

    in reply to: Harmonic Damper-Balancer, 1931 Series 43 Eight #410101

    Thanks, Ed. I found several rebuilders of the rubber vulcanized units but nothing describing this unit.

    in reply to: Harmonic Damper-Balancer, 1931 Series 43 Eight #410096

    I have a couple of technical papers regarding the Rolls-Royce friction dampener which they used for years. There is discussion and test data of potential substitutes for the original woven cotton duck material. I also found a photo of a cotton duck friction element.

    These materials are quite interesting but they do not really answer

    My immediate need, which is to restore my Pierce’s dampener to good condition and useful service. Surely someone has answered this question before now (one might reason)?

    in reply to: Harmonic Damper-Balancer, 1931 Series 43 Eight #410086

    Peter, the material found in the dampener is some sort of fabric or felt material, it is not rubber.

    Rolls-Royce at one time used a similarly-constructed dampener. The friction material was a radially-woven cotton duck.

    in reply to: Harmonic Damper-Balancer, 1931 Series 43 Eight #410090

    The tech stated the springs, bolts, metal parts looked good. The friction material: not so well (obviously).

    in reply to: Harmonic Damper-Balancer, 1931 Series 43 Eight #410089

    See photos of the dampener dismantled. Typical dampener I am familiar with, is made of steel/iron parts with rubber vulcanized between. The technician says this appears to be some sort of felt-like friction material.

    in reply to: PAS 2019 Meet – Fantastic – Thank You! #409975

    Great job, everyone! Kathy and I had a great time. It was great to see everyone and your Pierces.

    in reply to: Annual Meet #409969

    Missing your presence; it’s a nice meet.

    in reply to: 1932 model 54 value #409878

    Beautiful car! Eager to see it and meet you!

    in reply to: King-Seeley repair kit question about fading #409765

    I find the hydrostatic gauge interesting, but I am beginning to lean toward converting the ‘31 to an electric gauge after reading about all the issues.

Viewing 20 posts - 161 through 180 (of 568 total)