Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 1,321 through 1,340 (of 1,408 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Insulation #396773

    Here is the second.

    in reply to: Insulation #396788

    Here are Roger’s pics.

    He apparently has PC problems.

    in reply to: Winter Time Projects & Photos. #396744

    Ed,

    If you want, send me the S/Ns of the cars and I can look them up on the tables I have from Bernie, just to see if they have a PAS history.

    BTW, NICE Pierce Ice Chest! Cool find, very cool!

    in reply to: front axle u-bolt nuts #396720

    Jim, Read the NASA piece on locking mechanisms. Interesting, however curious that the tension caused by a locker would disappear when flat. One would think that there is memory in the metal otherwise the locker would remain flat when the nut comes off. I will need to discuss this with my 3rd-year Mechanical Engineering student Son (He knows EVERYTHING – ;-) ).

    I also understand the concept behind stretching threads as the locking mechanism, I just thought that the lockers enhanced that otherwise, flat washers would do just as well.

    Need to meditate on this one.

    in reply to: front axle u-bolt nuts #412399

    I don’t believe that split ring lock washers are supposed to “bite” into the nut, but merely exert tension against the nut so that the threads of the nut exert pressure against the threads of the stud / bolt. That is what keeps things locked. Old split ring washers loose their spring and thus their ability to exert tension against the nut.

    If you want washers that “bite” you need STAR washers, most commonly used to insure good electrical contact.

    Why split ring lock washers would not be used on aircraft is the CONSTANT vibration and its related stress. The vibration itself would cause nuts and bolts to come undone which is why aircraft bodies are riveted and not bolted. Heck, the vibration of an aircraft causes the metal to rupture. You do not see that on an automobile.

    Your other nutty explanation seems reasonable, Cliff. :-)

    in reply to: front axle u-bolt nuts #396715

    Craig is correct, old lock washers tend to be junk!

    New stainless rules.

    in reply to: Body Tag #396713

    a third

    in reply to: Body Tag #396714

    Another pic

    in reply to: Body Tag #396712

    I think that this is for a later, as in post 1929 Pierce, but others should comment.

    I think the correct piece for an earlier 20s car is as shown in the pic attached (more pics available – contact me) and the mounting is on the right side bottom of the cowl just aft of the engine compartment.

    I attached mine by using a combination of tiny screws, (0 X ⅜” SS pan-head slot – contact me for some) and automotive mounting tape. I used a fibre backing behind the cowl into which I screwed the screws. It was not easy to get the backing in place.

    That type of plaque comes up on EBAY occasionally and within the past two weeks one sold for about $49.

    in reply to: front axle u-bolt nuts #396708

    It is good to double check on double nuts or in your case, the octuple lack thereof.

    If the single nut arrangement is consistent throughout the eight locations on your front springs, then it is likely correct, or the idiot who last greased the springs 40-years ago messed up front to rear (although in a consistent fashion).

    However, if it will set your mind at ease, correct or otherwise, there seems to be ample thread showing on your U-Bolts to accommodate another nut.

    Personally, I would just leave them as they are unless the single nut and locker do not appear to do the job. If that was the case, I would just replace the single nut and washer. Otherwise, they are likely fine.

    I will also tell you that I do not have the constitution / disposition /personality to be the owner of a concours anything.

    Have fun with the car and have a laugh at Tony Costa’s humor! There is wisdom in that boy.

    And by the way, did you ask ANYTHING about greasing the springs, or did that line of discussion just appear? ;-)

    in reply to: Kerstin Shoberg promotes the marque! #396677

    Bravo Kerstin, Bravo!

    in reply to: Happy Holidays #396666

    Merry Christmas to all and a Piercing New Year!

    Make Merry this Festive Season!

    I look forward to seeing you all in Warwick, Rhode Island at the 2014 Annual Meet. (details now online)

    in reply to: Used Cars – June 15, 1920 #396649

    Buying used high-end cars has always been the thing to do if you want a great car at a reasonable price.

    Also note that the asking price of $650.00 or $850.00 F.O.B. Buffalo for these seven to eight year old Pierce-Arrow cars is $200.00 to $400.00 more than the cost of a NEW Ford of the time.

    in reply to: Leaf spring breakage #396605

    Things do spin out of control at times, eh?

    Merry Christmas to all and a Piercing New Year!

    in reply to: Leaf spring breakage #396602

    Jak,

    You just need an iPad to read them in bed!

    Peter

    in reply to: WSJ Article 11/27/13 Phil Hill’s 1931 Pierce 41 LeBaron #396574

    The current issue of Hemmings Classic Car Magazine has an article on Phil Hill and his contribution to the collector car hobby / industry and his impact on the Pebble Beach Concours.

    There in not only a pic of him, but of he and his lovely, 1931 Pierce-Arrow LeBaron Town Car Cabriolet, on the winner’s stand at Pebble Beach.

    in reply to: 1935 Pierce Arrow Sedan at January Mecum Auction #396568

    Bernie Weis’ records show the following about P-A #1080938: 1934, 836A, 136-in w/b, S/N: 1080938, E/N: 240934, 135-S-559, Sedan.

    If this is the 1080938 car, these are the details.

    in reply to: WSJ Article 11/27/13 Phil Hill’s 1931 Pierce 41 LeBaron #396567

    Thank you Stuart & Clara,

    A very nice piece for Thanksgiving reading!

    in reply to: 1937 1701 Sedan in Mecum Auction, Anaheim, CA, 11/21-23/13 #396545

    The winning bidder must have been wearing a mask and thin leather gloves, as he stole the car @ $34.500.

    Hats off to him, her or whomever!

    It certainly sets a precedent for the value of the cars.

    in reply to: Dyna Beads / Balance Beads #396507

    Balance Beads is a third name being marketed

Viewing 20 posts - 1,321 through 1,340 (of 1,408 total)