Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 167 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Reasoning for in fender headlights #410169

    I guess that’s a 2-horsepower Pierce…

    in reply to: 2021 Tentative Pierce Arrow annual meet #410119

    Hi Tony,

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but I remember the Board approving Buellton, CA for 2021.

    Do you mean 2022?

    Cheers

    in reply to: PAS 2019 Meet – Fantastic – Thank You! #409974

    Thanks, Greg & Ken & helpers for all your creative work! The Angola invasion and the personalized postcards at the banquet tables particularly stand out. Nancy and I had a great time driving the ’32!

    Bob

    Rick,

    Yeah, right, and there are several Pierce-Arrow automobiles on eBay for $25 , too!

    (The Green Book “Pierce-Arrow Sales Facts” for 1933 is one of the most scarce pieces of Pierce literature existing. There is one for every year of Pierce in that era, detailing all specs, body dimensions, paint & upholstery colors & patterns, prices, all body styles, and sales strategies. It is 175 pages, 4.5″ x 7″ format. I have a 1933, and a copy of a 1930. In the 1933 one, it refers to the “1933 Green Book Custom Car Supplement”, which apparently gives even further details on the custom bodied Pierces for that year, and which I would like to see, copy or buy. I have never even seen one.)

    Cheers

    Bob

    in reply to: Charging system #409819

    Sounds like a non-functioning cut-out. The battery voltage should rise to around 7 if the cutout is working.

    50 volts at the generator means there is no load connection to the battery, and you could damage the generator (and on cars with a Startix, blow the upper solenoid on the Startix – learned the hard way, then put a fuse in the wire to the Startix “gen”” terminal.)”

    in reply to: Ebay 1935 Pierce Arrow Twelve-55 Limousine #413668

    Was a previous PAS member’s – Vince Shiro of Van Nuys – see old rosters. Looks like good amateur older restoration, and probably good driver. No Startix, questionable upholstery fabric (hard to tell from pics), no belt or wheel stripes, engine turned instrument panel is not stock. I don’t understand the “normal” style brake pedal instead of the accelerator-shaped one used for power brakes. The power brake unit is there, though.

    in reply to: Need V-12 Distributor Cam #409583

    Hi Bill,

    I thought you sold your V12 – did you get another?

    Bob

    in reply to: 1980, 23rd Annual Meet, why two different locations? #409568

    Hi David,

    There was a PAS Western Meet in Carmel, CA starting on October 5, 1963.

    Cheers

    in reply to: 1928 PIERCE-ARROW MODEL 81 RUMBLE SEAT at auction #409463

    Amazing collection of early Harrah’s cars…

    in reply to: Greg Long #409432

    Yeah, he moves so fast the wind smoothed out the top of his head…

    in reply to: Trippe Light wrench #409318

    You might give Cord Blomquist a holler at [email protected]

    His father, Richard Blomquist, manufactured the largest variety of Trippe Light labels, hardware and brackets ever.

    Bob

    in reply to: Picnic buttons #409244

    Reverse side picture.

    in reply to: Picnic buttons #413639

    Hi David and All,

    To shed some light on the picnic buttons, in addition to the blue one, there was also an original red one, mfd by Whitehead & Hoag, as shown at left in the 2 pictures. It is 1-7/16″ diam.

    NorCal group also made a batch of repro’s as a fundraiser for our 2003 PAS Meet at Tahoe, at right in the 2 pictures. It is 1-11/16″ diam., clasp back. I still have many left Ken, if you don’t get one from David.

    Cheers,

    Bob

    in reply to: Branson Winter Board Meetings #409220

    Hi Merlin and Jane,

    Thank you for organizing another great Winter Mini-Meet. Nancy and I enjoyed the Titanic Museum, and the collections, and also a magic and variety show in Branson, which seems like the Midwest’s answer to a wholesome Las Vegas.

    Bob

    in reply to: Car History #409102

    Look it up in your Roster – shows car is a 1929 model 133 (between 2006477 & 6860).

    Cheers,

    Bob Jacobsen

    in reply to: How about a Bus. #409081

    One of the neat things about the ’35 commercial sedans (busses) is that they still had the Stewart-Warner power brakes on the wheels, but also had a disc brake on the driveshaft, engaged by the emergency brake lever. One of the first discs?

    in reply to: Help and advice needed. #409006

    Yes, the ’33, ’34, and ’35 all use the same reflectors, mounting rings and bezels.

    The ’33 Buick lenses fit, but leave an â…›” gap between lens shouder and chrome bezel – noticeable onlly when being judged.”

    in reply to: Help and advice needed. #413613

    George (my friend of 50-odd years – or is it my odd friend of 50 years?) et al.,

    I agree with your statement “…a 1934 12 conv coupe should have a body tag reading 338-P-nn (2 digits) and a 1935 12 conv coupe 338-P-nnn (3 digits). 1934-35 8s body tags would read 238-P-nn/n as above.”

    However, I would like to differ with your statement “The sequential number (following the P or the Y) pertains to BOTH 8s and 12s…their [sic] are no duplicate sequential body numbers on known 8s vs 12s.”

    THERE IS EVIDENCE of duplicate #’s when you try to lump 8’s & 12’s together:

    1. The Hale notes cite a 1934 twelve 338-P-10 (no other info) and our Roster has a 1934 eight 238-P-10 (Mr. Eastburn, S/N 2080284)

    2. The Hale notes cite a 1934 eight 238-P-13 (no other info) and our Roster has a 1934 twelve 338-P-13 (ex Tom Lyons, S/N 3119001).

    I therefore submit that the engineering code (238, 338) defines whether the car is an 8 or a 12, and that each code has its OWN sequence starting from 1 or 100.

    There could be some other supporting evidence – in my spare time (?) I will search rosters.

    Cheers,

    Bob

    in reply to: Help and advice needed. #408983

    Hi Johnny,

    Great car!

    P-A’s body #’s are confusing. From my records, there were at least 74 total 1934 & 1935 V12 Convertible Coupes built. Contrary to what George and Ed stated earlier, the code 338-P-xxx was used for both 1934 and 1935 V12 convertible coupes, NOT for both 1935 8’s plus 1935 12’s. The 1935 V12 conv. coupes probably restarted at 100, so we both agree that there were 33 1935 conv coupes made, and yours is #23.

    (The 1934 and 1935 8-cyl both used code 238-P-xxx and numbered 1 thru 32 (’34) and 100 thru 133 (’35) for a total of 66.)

    There are at least 9 1935 12’s known, now including yours, which was not previously known.

    Love to see it in person.

    Bob

    in reply to: Top insert finish trim #408917

    It is probably the same as used on my ’32 Ford…

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 167 total)