Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 181 through 200 (of 430 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Holiday Musings… 1971 Pierce-Arrow #405608

    I do think it takes a measure of intestinal fortitude to take liberties

    with the design elements in a boat tail Riviera. Everyone who bought one

    must have fought parting with them when the junker was on the horizon,

    for they are plentiful and affordable on the market today.

    in reply to: Holiday Musings… 1971 Pierce-Arrow #405606

    I’m enchanted by the 1966 P-A design. Please make sure mine has a 426 Hemi

    in it. A 4 speed would allow me to make it sing or growl to my ear’s

    satisfaction. I wonder if Santa would trade in his sleigh on one?

    in reply to: Pinterest #405525

    Ben,

    Thanks for putting the record straight and the hard work you do for the PAS.

    Tony

    in reply to: Primer cups needed #405370

    Richard,

    If you want an exact replacement, Wayne Simoni has a shop that makes

    brass parts and other items that are difficult to find. I couldn’t find

    his site on the internet and hope he is still in business as I need him

    to make a drain spigot for my early Rambler. He is listed in the HCCA

    Roster.

    in reply to: Power Steering , Power Brakes and Air Conditioning #405305

    I’m surprised that nobody has discussed the coolers filled with

    ice that were suspended from door windows. These were popular and

    I believe appeared in the forties. They didn’t put out cool air

    when stationary, but with all the engineers in our Society (pro

    and amateur) an appropriately placed fan would chill things.

    in reply to: Power Steering , Power Brakes and Air Conditioning #405281

    A rational discussion on an emotional subject. How does that happen

    this day and age? There are still many unrestored Pierce-Arrows

    desperate for a loving restoration. Time is ticking away as the cost of

    renewal races for the sky. The cost of storage is going up in this

    crowded world and most owners never give a thought to income they would

    realize renting out the space their beauty takes up. The Pierce-Arrow

    Society is the only hope for the less desirable of the make that are

    missing a $150,000 restoration. By providing parts sources, manuals,

    knowledge, events, but mostly exposing our cars to the public, we can

    carry our hobby into an uncertain future and provide a happy ending to

    forlorn sedans in barns. Let’s be happy and kind while we share our

    differing ideas keeping in mind that a strong club benefits us all.

    in reply to: Silver Arrow show car being auctioned #405246

    If these cars get any more valuable, someone may have one miraculously

    appear in their garage. Kind of like the rare Tucker Convertible that

    showed up recently. That’s an idea whose time has come: a Silver Arrow

    convertible with external exhaust pipes! Such a beast might have saved

    the greatest line of cars known to the well-connected.

    in reply to: Pierce-Arrow Bodies #413225

    Peter,

    Leon Rubay designed the 1915 White in 30HP,45HP,and 60HP offerings.

    White stated in its ads “the car that makes made-to-order bodies

    unnecessary”. I know that GM gets all the mentions for corporate

    design attempts, but White should get recognition for having their

    total lines custom designed. The results are that my 1915 White 4-45

    7 passenger touring is the first dual cowl production car produced

    in America. The Lanchester of the UK had an odd looking dual cowl in

    1904.They also used in house designed disc brakes and patented the

    harmonic balancer at a later date.

    Tony Costa

    in reply to: Texas-Florida-Hurricanes and our Pierce-Arrow cars #405071

    Mr. Minnie, how are you and the magnificent collection you work

    for making out?

    Tony Costa

    in reply to: 1913 66 on ebay. #405070

    Thanks for your concern, Peter. I don’t have a widow yet, so the

    question is moot. I’ll take you up on the lunch though, as long as you

    don’t share your stogie. They remind me of my mentor, Mr. Roland Zillmer.

    Tony

    in reply to: high speed miss #405055

    I started my ’36 1601 without the air cleaner. The car backfired,

    puking gas that caught on fire. A quick thinking helper beat out the

    fire with his shirt. No damage resulted, but I still have nightmares.

    in reply to: 1913 66 on ebay. #405054

    The first HCCA Tour I took my 1912 Pierce 36HP to was held in Sun

    Valley. Bill Harrah was there, along with one of his favorite cars out of

    1453, his 1913 Pierce-Arrow 66.This tour must have been special to him as

    he flew our lunch from Reno,food, servers, plates, tables, the works.

    125 pre-15 cars showed up for lunch at his ranch in Stanley, Idaho. That

    night Cecil Andrus, the Governor of Idaho and future Sec. of the Interior

    Welcomed us to Idaho. Harrah had 2 armed guards with him.

    I managed to pass Leo Plamindom(SP) in his fast Stevens Duryea and

    incurred his wrath. My widow can cite the car’s race heritage when she

    disposes of it.

    in reply to: 1913 66 on ebay. #413200

    The auction car’s number is 66748. It would appear to not be Rodney’s

    #66715. Peerless also produced an 824.7 cubic inch engine ’12, ’13 ’14

    and ’15’.Bore was 5″ and stroke was 7″, like Pierce’s. Peerless outdid

    Pierce by inserting 572 cubes to Pierce’s 524 cubes in their 48HP cars

    (’12, ’13, ’14,’15). Marmon had 572 cubes in their 48HP cars ’13, ’14,

    and ’15.

    SAE horsepower formulas only considered bore sizes. In other words,

    any car with a 3 3/4 inch bore was 22HP. Stroke or cubes didn’t

    matter. By 1910, a University had a machine that could apply a brake

    on engine output. Brake HP didn’t become common until well into the

    twenties.

    This didn’t stop car advertisements from using fictitious HP’s in

    the teens. My ’14 Chalmers was advertised as 60 HP with 72 brake HP

    (415 cubes). 1914 Packard 48HP had 84 brake HP (524 cubes).

    in reply to: Front Spring Rebound Rubbers #405036

    I’ve heard about blocks of rubber in the McMasters-Carr(SP) catalog

    that can be shaped to your needs. I’m not sure how you would attach

    it to the metal, but some awesome glues are available. The new

    rubber would respond to its usage much better than that rock hard

    fossil can take abuse.

    in reply to: 1918 Pierce truck #405035

    Dave, I bet your ’17 truck doesn’t have front wheels like this one does.

    The solid rubber tires from America have a strand of wire inside that

    gets welded (?) somehow. The tires on the auction vehicle are the shiniest

    I’ve ever seen.

    Tony Costa

    in reply to: Thermostate for model 33 #404617

    Hats off to the fine comments on this subject. I know of a Model 33

    that has been in the same family since it was new. It was a graduation

    present. The car has been overheating since it was brought home and

    P.A. service couldn’t cure the problem. I wonder if application of

    some of this advice would effect a solution?

    in reply to: 1934 Studebaker-based Pierce-Arrows Part 2 #404581

    Your attempts with the Champion, Jet, Airflow and Lowey’s ’50’s

    Studebaker, brought back memories of the ’58 Packard-Baker. Today the

    entry level Mercedes are careful to not share a platform with a

    lesser make, though Audi gets away with it through its VW connection.

    The Templar was engineered as a fine car. How can you start with a

    $710 Champion (you could buy the cheapest Ford for $706) and end up

    with a car that would show up on a Pierce-Arrow sales floor (and have

    a smile on the dealer’s face)? It smacks of the Brewster/Ford V8

    combo with the grill shaped like a heart or Franklin’s marriage to

    a REO body and chassis resulting in the first muscle car (?), the

    Olympic. Dropping that 100 horsepower air-cooled engine in and

    ditching the radiator and water-cooled weight, really made that $1,385

    car scoot. It didn’t save Franklin or REO though.

    in reply to: 1934 Studebaker-based Pierce-Arrows Part 2 #404533

    Paul, we must be on the same wave length, as I owned a 1961 Chrysler

    Imperial two door hardtop a few decades ago (I paid $300 for it). I

    applaud your design skills and abilities with the computer.

    Tony Costa

    in reply to: 1934 Studebaker-based Pierce-Arrows Part 2 #413157

    The Templar was a car from the twenties that attempted to produce a

    reduced sized car with high quality, styling, and performance. The

    engineers had previous employment with Chalmers, Pope-Hartford,

    Stearns, Matheson, and Mercer, though it was an assembled car. It sold

    for $1,950 in ’24, while a “80” sold for $2,850 in ’25. I can’t think

    of any other car that had these three qualities as a design attempt. I

    was 2 hours into a trip arranged prior, to purchase a Templar, when the

    seller informed me he had sold it out from under me, to a museum that

    specialized in Templars (the wound hasn’t healed). What if Pierce had

    developed a similar entry level model (as many German Luxury Makes do

    today)?

    in reply to: 1931 showed up on Ebay #413156

    A little “raging pink” on the upholstery is an excellent way to

    deflect a potential buyer’s attention away from other short-comings.

    Maybe personalized art (tattoos) on cars we wish to dispose of, would

    endear them to younger hobbyists?

Viewing 20 posts - 181 through 200 (of 430 total)